1. 龙虎豹 2020-01-25 09:39:39
|
|
2. 引刀一快 2020-01-25 10:38:16
|
如果海洋公园加一个世界巨型淡水鱼展馆,我保证会有3亿游客专程去睇。
|
3. 真真薯片 2020-01-25 11:45:38
|
如果海洋公园要钱,又有信心洗完钱后可以改善生意赚得返,佢应该去问银行借,最多正苦帮佢倾低息,而唔系做申手大将军
问正苦攞100亿,超高薪养住里面班只手遮天既高层,仲要蚀到抽筋,有冇摘错?
|
4. 浪子心声 2020-01-25 16:13:34
|
汤博士新年快乐!!
百分百认同「香港已经有迪士尼,海洋公园已经是多余的」,还有博士建议的两个方案(1)将海洋公园变成一个优闲公园,或(2)将整个海洋公园拆卸重建,变成一个地产项目,都是极之有见地的方向,希望政府考虑考虑 。
|
5. 引刀一快 2020-01-25 17:42:37
|
如果香港连海洋公园都保唔住,大陆人就会开始睇唔起香港,然后,香港嘅附加值就会一路衰减。
|
6. 浪子心声 2020-01-25 18:20:53
|
刀兄新年快乐:
我个人认为,如果香港政府在处理「海洋公园问题」上表现得「有智慧、有远见,有决心」,才能让人家看得起。
现在香港政府建议用一百亿救海洋公园,不但大陆睇唔起香港,连香港人都睇唔起自己啦!!
|
7. 十一哥 2020-01-25 19:25:03
|
冇谂过救得番…只系苟延残喘、等班高层/围内承建…有细艺…揾多几年咁解。 初衷…话到明系游乐..使完又再拨多一百几十亿玩落去…
|
8. Small Potato 2020-01-25 22:23:56
|
祝博士及各位读者: 🎊新年快乐,身体健康🎊 博士好波!希望班高官,睇到博士呢篇文章啦,将呢幅地改做地产项目好过啦,100亿条数吾细,用黎起公屋或用系医疗到仲有意义啦
|
9. 引刀一快 2020-01-26 00:01:10
|
浪子心声兄
如果香港连一个自主嘅大型展览游乐场都冇,咁香港真系乜都冇,只能做“金融中心”。 拆佢用嚟起楼,我保证大陆同胞笑到肚挛,长隆喺一个大湾区里面都可以有两个游乐场,香港就维持一个都维持唔到。 本来盛智文搞得有声有色,忽然被炒,今日嘅困局,唔关海洋公园事。 另外,我想讲,就算铲平海洋公园嚟起楼,起出嚟嘅楼价都唔会大众化,亦唔会一次过起十万单位嚟队冧港楼楼价,最终,损失嘅系60's以后嘅两三代香港人,无得又何以偿失?
|
10. Mike Rowse 2020-01-26 12:52:47
|
Ocean Park’s glory days are behind it – use the site for housing, and invest in Hong Kong Disneyland instead26 January 2020- Between dwindling attendances and fierce regional competition, Ocean Park is struggling. Better to use the 91.5-hectare site to meet a pressing need – housing
- If money is to be used for theme park development, spend it on expanding Hong Kong Disneyland
Ocean Park occupies a site of 91.5 hectares compared to Tai Koo Shing’s 21.5 hectares. That means we could have three housing developments of a comparable size, providing 40,000 decent apartments and still have 30 hectares left over for green space. Photo: Martin Chan When my two eldest children were very young, some 40 years ago, we bought annual passes to Ocean Park for the whole family and visited often. It was far and away the best option for a family day out at that time. As the first commissioner for tourism (1999-2000), I visited again to show support and acquaint myself with plans for future development. The negotiations with the Walt Disney Company, which l was involved in and which led to the agreement to build Hong Kong Disneyland, were ongoing at the time. There was concern in some quarters that a new internationally branded theme park would call into question the existing park’s future viability. The social disturbances of the past few months haveand the 2019 figure will probably drop below 5 million. But the important point here is that the decline in business began well before the recent troubles led to a sharp drop in the number of mainland visitors. In return, the park would completely revamp the facility and aim to drive attendance up to 7.5 million by 2027-28. Perhaps unsurprisingly, reception to the request (“give us another HK$10 billion and we’ll try to get back to where we were a decade ago”) was less than enthusiastic. Recently I visited Ocean Park again. It was a very pleasant day out, not very crowded, hence little queuing, and I particularly enjoyed the dolphin show, as did all the other attendees. I note from thethis is one of the attractions due to disappear in the redevelopment scheme. Opinion Newsletter Get updates direct to your inbox In the decades since Ocean Park opened, development on the mainland side of the boundary has proceeded at pace.next to Macau, now has several theme parks and entertainment zones of high standard, with more under construction. One is called Water World, which I have also visited and which would seem to be a direct competitor to the future water activity area in Ocean Park, now under construction. I think as a community we now need to face the sad fact that Ocean Park’s glory days are probably behind it, and it is unlikely ever again to attract the vast numbers of mainland visitors that it did in the past, given the competition. Which leads us to two important questions: is there anything else we could do with the land; and is there anything else we could do with HK$10 billion? The answer to the first question is a resounding yes. Ocean Park occupies a site of 91.5 hectares compared to Tai Koo Shing’s 21.5 hectares. That means we could have three housing developments of a comparable size, providing 40,000 decent apartments and still have 30 hectares left over for green space. That could include a slimmed-down facility focused on marine life and the pandas, perhaps run by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department. Increased frequency of trains on the South Island Line plus a spur to the new ocean-side housing mean we have a ready-made contribution to addressing Hong Kong’s criminal shortage of housing. Which leads us to the second question, where I think the answer is also affirmative. We have one facility here that no other city or province in South China can boast, and that is a world-"" data-pf_style_display="block" data-pf_style_visibility="visible" data-pf_rect_width="702.2584838867188" data-pf_rect_height="170" orig-style="null" style="box-sizing: border-box; box-shadow: none !important;">Here’s an idea: why not reopen talks with the Walt Disney Company, put our HK$10 billion on the table, and challenge them to do the same. With HK$20 billion, we could accelerate provision of new themed areas to complete the first park and even make a start on the second one on theacross the road. That would be a resounding vote of confidence in Hong Kong’s future as a tourist destination, both by the government here and by the world’s leading entertainment company. Some might say I am biased in favour of Disney, bearing in mind my role in the original negotiations and my lifelong nickname of Mickey Mouse. But what could be more appropriate as we come into the new year of the Chinese zodiac, in our house known as the Year of the Mouse. All we need to do now is find a government with courage and strategic vision. That really would be a magical day. Mike Rowse is the CEO of Treloar Enterprises Mike Rowse Mike Rowse has lived in Hong Kong since 1972, and is a naturalised Chinese citizen. He spent six years in the ICAC from 1974 to 1980, then 28 years in the government as an administrative officer until retirement in December 2008. He is now the search director for Stanton Chase International, and also hosts a radio talk show and writes regularly for both English and Chinese media.
|
11. 讲都唔够胆讲 2020-01-26 14:29:11
|
创新意念由孔主席提出最好,例如打造华人永远界规模最大嘅凌灰阁,可以解决未来十年财赤,孔主席可以做永远主席,获得永远大紫宫勋章。
|
12. 引刀一快 2020-01-26 19:08:03
|
海洋公园得唔得,睇人啫,论潜力,绝对胜过迪士尼,因为迪士尼本来就系一个主题公园,所有发展局限於细路主题,海洋公园就自由得多,攞香港人嘅钱投资俾人地赚,提出呢个建议嘅人唔该计条数嚟睇下。 香港得番一间大型游乐场,咁即系唐老鸭做独市,你一拆咗海洋公园,佢就揸住你春袋,要乜你都要俾,唔系大陆同胞嚟到冇嘢玩,旅客人数大降。
|
|