地产博客 > 资深会员专栏 返回
浏览人次:35318    回应:20
资深会员专栏

「限购令」与「限奶令」在效果上的分别

 

浪子心声

2018年7月16日
特首林郑月娥继推出「新楼空置税」及「资助房屋以负担能力定价」后,近日她好像正在放风「住房限购令」,简称「限购令」,如果实行未来香港住房只可售与香港永久居民。大家可能在想「限购令」能否像「限奶令」般在一夜之间完全改变局面。首先笔者认为上一任香港特首唯一的德政就是「限奶令」,在政策制定上能掌握问题核心,婴儿奶粉是「民生必须品」,在实行资本主义自由市场的香港,必须品在供应不足时政府是有责任作出适当干预,稳定社会民生。「限奶令」法规简单,离开香港的16岁以上人士每人每天不得携带总净重超过两罐900克奶粉,违例者一经定罪,最高可被罚款50万港元及监禁两年,因此法例非常容易实施。更重要的是「限奶令」效果明显,在2013年3月实施后,可说一夜之间香港妈妈再不用担忧买不到奶粉,由於水客只能带两罐奶粉,大大减低婴儿奶粉在港需求,婴儿奶粉供不应求的问题在实施「限奶令」后即时迎刃而解。

首先「限奶令」和「限购令」本质是相同的,因为「婴儿奶粉」和「住宅楼宇」同是「民生必须品」。虽然过去在此论坛有过多次的争议,但大众如有留意特首林郑月娥上任后不久就已明确表示「住房」是「非一般商品」,而笔者当然认为住房是百分百的必须品,世上有哪个政府会认为人民不需要住房。因此「限购令」和「限奶令」本质上同样为解决「民生必须品」在供应不足时作出的市场干预措施。第二「限购令」法规亦是非常简单明确,香港住房只可售与香港永久居民,如同「限奶令」非常容易实施,亦可大幅度减低需求,尤其是没有内地买家,香港住房便从一个13亿人口的市场降至700万人的香港市场,需求必然大幅度降低。

很可惜在效果方面「限购令」应无法产生像「限奶令」般在一夜之间就能解决供不应求问题,主因为婴儿奶粉在大幅度减少水货需求后,香港本身是有足够奶粉应付本港婴儿和只能带两罐奶粉的水货客需求。相反香港每年只得约两万个私楼供应,本身就不足以应付香港永久居民的需求。更重要是香港一手楼市场可说完全没有效率,大地产商垄断市场及主导新楼定价,就算实行「限购令」,地产商不会即时减价,更有可能继续加价,继续慢慢卖,因此实行「限购令」将不会出现即时解决香港楼房供应不足及楼价过高问题。

虽然如此,但若能同时实施「限购令」和「新楼空置税」,应可在一两年间令香港私楼慢慢调整到港人负担能力的价格,因为「限购令」能大幅度收缩香港私楼市场的买家对像,一年后当大量私楼现楼供应到位时,同时「新楼空置税」限期又到,地产商便需要加快卖楼,但卖楼对像只得番香港永久居民,若要卖得出定价自然要以香港人负担能力为准,现今楼价已大幅度超出港人负担能力,一手楼定价必然需要调整。同时地产商在投地时的出价亦会大幅度调整,减低成本,因为他们应意识到在「限购令」下,整体房地产项目必须以香港经济和港人收入界定售价,笔者相信到时效果应相当明显。

虽然「限购令」不能一夜之间解除大部分香港人买不起私楼的问题,但现时港府已决定实行「新楼空置税」及「资助房屋以负担能力定价」,再加上「限购令」便可能令所有出售房屋不论是资助或非资助都能以负担能力定价,楼价的升幅只会随著香港人的收入而上升,到时不单只年轻人,所有香港人对买不起楼的担忧便能大幅度减低,因此笔者希望特首能尽快推出「限购令」,从而完善香港的房屋制度,稳定人心。


 
 
我要回应
我的称呼
回应 / 意见
验证文字
 
会员登入
登入ID 或 网名
密码
1. Luguo 2018-07-16 06:11:53
买咗个啲会上街,输打赢要是常态,无人会自找麻烦吧
2. 巴 2018-07-16 06:27:21
新例落成后,以公司形式持有物业,过半股东必须为港人。
3. Patrick 2018-07-16 10:05:49
限购令未必系限定香港永久居民先买得,可能系话要限制在港居留时间,类似综援,过去三年要在港居留800日
4. 淡淡又要悲哀 2018-07-16 19:27:58
限购令的作用在於饥饿营销,作用是创造炒卖气氛,令香港物业成为限量版的物体。北上广深楼价就是被多年来一波又一波的限购令不断炒高的,林太好清楚此一现象。

限购令一出,更加冇业主敢卖楼。
限购令更加刺激物业以公司股份转让形式交易,令公司货更加值钱。

限购令的目的是令香港住宅价格稳步上升,大家不要解读错误林太的出发点。
5. 尽快推出限购令的好处 2018-07-16 19:53:53
作为在上海静安区拥有三套物业的物业好友,支持尽快推出限购令。

限购令刺激购楼欲望,已落户香港的强国土豪将不惜假离婚争取Quota 买多层,而未落户香港的大土豪就会以假结婚,假专才,甚至假亲属(每天quota150人)的形式来港抢被限购的稀缺资源(香港住宅)。

越被限购被限制的资源,其市场价格就越高。限购令帮助催生购楼欲望。

浪子未买过大陆楼,不知道限购令出咗后搞到有一排好多大城市离婚都要大排长龙。


6. 限贷令及限价令 2018-07-16 20:14:46
空置税失败后,林太明年应该会推出限购令。但又因为限购令结果令本港住宅楼价升得更加恐布,林太会在2020或2021年左右效法大陆推出限贷令及限价令,以争取连任。

条件式反射,大家一见推出新辣招,就意识到楼价好快又会升,於是又飞扑入市。

鐡打的楼市,流水的特首。无计!
7. 引刀一快 2018-07-17 05:43:54
浪子心声兄

限奶令系大陆嘅order嚟架。
8. Carson 2018-07-17 08:14:02
唔好再出辣招了,越辣越升,除非外围暴跌金融危机。
9. 辣椒仔 2018-07-17 08:28:42
出完辣招,楼价必升已经成为全民共识,多年来有晒track record你睇。引刀话哉,炒楼必赢钱,刚需中的刚需。
10. 引刀一快 2018-07-17 08:49:56
Carson兄

不一定,睇下咩招啫,比如100%BSD。
11. 1000%BSD 2018-07-17 14:33:22
如果明天BSD加到1000%,咁即使我手头上的公司货即时加500%(5倍)都会有大把土豪争住买,因为都可以节省500%印花税。

咁大家估下隔壁的非用公司名hold住的单位业主肯减价沽楼吗?引刀话斋,不蚀底才是刚需中的刚需。

BSD加到1000%的后果,就是中原指数急急升穿500点大关,普天同庆!🤣林太敢不敢试吓?


12. 浪子心声 2018-07-17 14:56:35
我睇今次施政报告都应该会出嚟招「香港永久居民住房限购令」,因为嚟紧嗰两个月楼价无得跌,到10月可能仲会升咗,林郑点向中央交代,唯有出嚟招,大家拭目以待 。

系啊出完嚟招楼价可能都会继续升,但特首唔做嘢佢自己就问题多多喇!

13. 王道 2018-07-17 15:17:59
不要再把精力放在旁门左道的辣招了,xxD, 空置税,限购令,限价令,租管,资本增值税........,出得越多越增加港人对楼价必升的信念。

全力以赴开拓郊野公园,移山填海开拓新巿镇吧。香港班后生唔知沙田,大围都是填海填回来的。

一天到晚就说辣招buy time. 咁多年来辣招buy 的time 究竟益咗那些人?大家应该知道答案。
14. 不败 2018-07-17 21:38:58
今个星期从山顶Twelve Peaks到九龙天铸都破顶价不绝出现。 空置税阴公真的是一丝威力都冇。

楼市太不俾面娥六招了,林郑情何以堪!

吹牛吹咗半年的空置税令大家空欢喜一埸,於是下半年又会把寄托放在未推出已经知道冇用的限购令上。 加油💪

15. 真正王道 2018-07-17 23:12:09
13楼,从前内地无咁多有钱人,香港起多啲楼增加供应可算是王道,但今时今日中国内地有钱人多的是,香港起多多楼都唔够满足13亿人口需求,限购今才是真正王道。
16. 33连升 2018-07-18 08:20:33
内地楼价又连升33个月。限购令已经在内地城市失效,睇唔到为何在香港可以成功。
17. 林郑unimpressive 2018-07-19 15:25:10
浪子你仲要话林病有心有力,睇时人哋话佢unimpressive


‘Gross mismanagement’ by Hong Kong’s four chief executives led to present city woes, author and ex-colonial policy adviser Leo Goodstadt says

Economist blasts city’s post-1997 leaders in new book, calling Tung Chee-hwa ‘a failure’, Donald Tsang business-minded, Leung Chun-ying ‘miscalculating’ and Carrie Lam unimpressive

The “gross mismanagement” of Hong Kong by the city’s four chief executives to date has resulted in the current problems faced by residents – from the housing shortage to a flawed education system and political uncertainty – according to a former chief policy adviser to the last two colonial governors.

The scathing comments by economist Leo Goodstadt are reflected in his new book, titled A City Mismanaged: Hong Kong’s Struggle For Survival .

The author argues the city’s post-1997 leaders emulated private sector models in public administration and imposed unnecessarily tight control over the provision of public services.

Goodstadt came to Hong Kong in 1962 and served as the first head of the government-appointed Central Policy Unit from 1989 to 1997. He told the Post in a recent interview: “Gross mismanagement in government is not caused by Hong Kong’s political system but by the incompetent performance of the individual power holders.”

The mismanagement, Goodstadt said, had led to current woes in the city, such as the housing shortage, overcrowding in public hospitals and ineffective ­handling of relations with the ­central government.

Goodstadt, in the interview, questioned the political skills of current leader Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor and said her administrative performance was unimpressive, with her insistence on the profit-driven business model of governance.

In his book, Goodstadt said Tung Chee-hwa, Hong Kong’s first chief executive, was “a failure” and “just an entrepreneur” lacking political talent, while his successor Donald Tsang Yam-kuen damaged good governance by overly committing to business interests.

According to Goodstadt, the two leaders were responsible for shrinking public housing programmes and liquidating the Housing Authority’s land bank to make way for private developers.

Third chief executive Leung Chun-ying had a “serious mistrust of a large proportion of the population” while he “miscalculated” his credentials and connections for building diplomacy with mainland Chinese officials, Goodstadt said.

Only Tsang responded to inquiries from the Post over Goodstadt’s comments. “I have much respect for Mr Goodstadt as an old friend of Hong Kong, and he is entitled to his views on how it might be better managed,” Tsang said.
The people of Hong Kong seem to be warning those in power
Leo Goodstadt, author

Goodstadt claimed “the people of Hong Kong seem to be warning those in power that the problems of daily life have become so severe that families can no longer rely on their own resources to survive”.

By the end of 2017, the Hong Kong government held a fiscal reserve exceeding HK$1.7 trillion (US$216.6 billion), official data showed.

18. 嘥声坏气 2018-07-21 11:44:34
楼价上升最大获利者是政府,你叫佢点会真心推跌楼价呢.
19. 穷人思维 2018-07-21 12:45:38
穷淡就是希望政府帮手打残楼价,拉近贫富差距。

穷淡多不思上进,不求自己发达,但求他人扒街。

穷淡,真的是穷得有道理


21. Duncan 2018-07-25 13:16:17

Podcast: Deconstructing Trump’s tariffs, turning point in history and the end of globalisation

Workers in a textile factory in Anxin, Hebei province on April 5, 2017. Photo: AFP
5-7 minutes

The deepening trade dispute between the United States and China could mark a “turning point in history”, ending the system of global trade that brought low-cost goods to consumers and fuelled the rise of the Chinese mainland and other emerging markets in just a few decades, according to noted economist and author Richard Duncan.

Bangkok-based Duncan believes the US$50 billion of Chinese products designated for 25 per cent tariffs by the Trump administration – in addition to a proposed 10 per cent tariff on an additional US$200 billion in Chinese goods – may represent the first steps in a policy shift by Washington that goes far beyond what many observers expect.

“I am becoming concerned that they really do intend to put up trade tariffs on a very large scale against China and that perhaps there’s more to this strategy than just balancing trade. They may be intent on stopping China’s economic growth altogether, now that China has become so large they are becoming not only an economic competitor, but potentially a military threat to US global dominance. If that’s the case, this could be a turning point in history,” Duncan said in a new South China Morning Post business podcast.

While it is too early to say how the trade talks between the two sides will play out, one concern is that escalating tariffs, beginning with the US$34 billion of Chinese products which went into effect on July 6, are about to become the norm, rather than the exception.

Author and economist Richard Duncan. Photo: Handout

Another is whether the trade policies are really designed to reverse the deindustrialisation of the US economy – a theme made prominent during Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

“Over the last 30 years the rapid economic rise of China has really transformed the world, but if the US starts putting tariffs on US$200 billion and US$500 billion of Chinese exports, then China’s economy could go into a very serious crisis,” Duncan said.

Duncan, who now publishes independent research at his subscription video newsletter Macro Watch (richardduncaneconomics.com), said China’s growth could come to a “screeching halt”, resulting in millions of job losses, while a domino slowdown would also be felt among its major trading partners.

Another outcome would be rising inflation, higher interest rates, and a global drag on asset prices ranging from stocks to real estate.

China reports record trade surplus with US and exports growth in eve of tariffs

“The impact would be global and we would see a drop in metal prices and that would be a blow to metal and mining companies. Also as commodity prices fell, the economies of the commodity-producing economies would go into recession,” he said.

China’s trade surplus with the United States reached a monthly record of US$28.9 billion in June. Photo: Bloomberg

Duncan started his career in finance in Hong Kong in 1986, working as a research analyst for a local brokerage. His insights into the global economy were partly inspired by visits to factories in Guangdong province, where he witnessed first-hand the rapid industrial transformation underway at the time.

“There were factories all along the Pearl River Delta full of 19-year-old women working for US$3 per day. It didn’t take long to realise that this was going to be very deflationary and very disruptive for the US economy if we had free trade with China because clearly this would result in the deindustrialisation of the US because how could it compete when it paid its workers roughly US$200 per day,” Duncan said.

Duncan said his thoughts on global trade were also fuelled by his experience heading equity research departments for James Capel Securities and Salomon Brothers in Bangkok during the 1990s, a period that he credits as his education in “bubblenomics”.

Duncan later worked as a financial sector specialist for the World Bank in Washington.

In 2003, he laid out his theories on global trade in the international bestseller The Dollar Crisis, a book which he said “forecast the global economic crisis [of 2008] quite accurately”.

Richard Duncan during the Hong Kong paperback release of the The Dollar Crisis on June 17, 2005. Photo: SCMP

Duncan, an American, said he does not side with Washington in this conflict. Instead he has been promoting an alternative path that takes advantage of low interest rates to help fund state-backed scientific research on a massive scale.

“I don’t view this as a conflict between the US and China. It is not that simple, it’s not team USA versus team China. There are interests in the United States that have benefited enormously from this arrangement that now exists, in particular, the large US multinationals. They have been able to drive down their labour costs by moving their factories from Detroit and other US cities into China. Their wage costs have collapsed as a result of this move. The share of profits that are split between labour and capital have shifted.”

Duncan thinks a moon shot, similar in nature to Nasa’s Apollo programme of the 1960s – this time in such areas as genetic engineering, biotechnology, nanotechnology and clean energy – is the best way forward.

“It would be much better for the government to undertake at the government level a very aggressive investment programme … in new industries and new technologies,” Duncan said.