主頁 搵樓/成交 放盤 數據公佈 地產新聞 地產博客 置業手冊 背景 / 聲明 / 聯絡我們 繁體簡體English
瀏覽人次 : 30186    回應 : 12
敢說亮話
政府應該恢復勾地
 
湯文亮博士
紀惠集團行政總裁
2015年8月11日

  新地投得元朗站物業,冇份投地的測量師個個都好似樓神上身,話新地最少多付25%,咁樣講,即是叫郭老太大發雷霆,雷霆真的是多得他們不少,有評論員話,以示公正,應該公開第二標,很奇怪,沒有測量師表示支持,那位評論員真唔知抑或假唔知,第二標是關鍵,作用是迫第一標繼續出價的武器,亦是測量師的權利,怎樣可以放棄,唔表態亦是正常,他們反而擔心政府立例公開所有落標價,保持緘默是最好做法。其實政府不需要立例,有一個做法可以公開第二,第三標,甚至整個過程,就是恢復勾地,繼而拍賣,整個過程一目了然,公開公正。

  有人立刻反駁,當日我寫過不少文章,要求政府取消勾地,否則,勾地表即是大地產商土地儲備表,最後做成供應短缺,今日我又提出勾地,是否以今天的我打倒昨日的我,當然不是,雖然恢復勾地,但之前一定要做一些優化工作,就是推行勾地費,任何地產商勾出一幅土地,經拍賣後由其他地產商奪得,政府會付1%成交價給予勾地者,如果由勾地者奪得,則減收1%。大家千祈唔好睇少1%,如果以新地奪得元朗站物業計算,就差不多有一億元,就算一塊普通地皮,若果成交價是十億元,勾地者可以有一千萬元收入,用作彌補勾地時所用的費用及利息支出,我認為相當合理。

  測量師亦應該歡迎這個方法,他們會免費為地產商制定勾地計劃,倘若成功勾出土地,無論勾地者是否能夠奪得土地,他們可以收取部份政府所付勾地費,唔成功就唔收費,而且揸住個勾地計劃去遊說不同地產商,好過現在免費為那些招標土地做預測。我深信這個計劃一定行得通,如果香港政府唔行,俾上海,廣州,星架坡等城市先行,我今次提議就變成為他人作嫁衣裳。

 
我要回應
我的稱呼
回應 / 意見
驗証文字
 
回應 / 留言規則
  1. 禁止撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論;
  2. 禁止以名稱/暱稱/綽號/同音字等批評或映射任何人士、機構、公司;
  3. 禁止發佈有關招聘、推銷、廣告等內容;
  4. 禁止公開任何個人資料(如電話號碼、電郵地址、即時通訊帳號等)。

敬請留言者自律。本網站保留刪除/堵截任何留言的權利。

1. 凡人 2015-08-11 08:43:27
算吧,弱勢政府的制度難變,一直都係奉行唔做唔錯,有事先來補鑊,尤其是房屋問題。
博士的提議一定會有其他國家城市賞識。
2. 大寶二寶 2015-08-11 09:06:55
請問博士对於政府來講有咩好處?好似無喇喇少咗1%收入。
3. 凡人 2015-08-11 09:18:35
正如獎勵生育,對於政府來講又有咩好處?
4. AH-HO 2015-08-11 09:26:28
真心吾明白。
宜家D地產商好像都投地投得好積極,甘政府如果定期的推地拍賣,有什麼問題呢?
5. Alan Pepper 2015-08-11 10:16:55
If there's money to be made, people will do it... seems like a good idea... not a single penny comes out from the government. Dr. had pointed this out long ago. However, how to control if too many 勾地 ? Or does the government have control of the maximum number of 勾地 per year? Seems like a stupid question of course they can have control but just out of curiosity do they have control with existing laws and regulations?
6. 無聊人 2015-08-11 12:27:09
容許我好單純咁諗,呢個辦法完全唔吸引大型地產商,但係對於中小型既嚟講就肯定係正,再諗衰D,莫非博士有地想投?哈哈!
7. Alan Pepper 2015-08-12 10:24:54
Morning Professor, sorry to take up your space:

http://www.am730.com.hk/article-276821

首破信用卡付款白牌車 警拘5司機搜Uber辦公室

2015年08月12日

警方首次破獲以信用卡付款的「白牌車」服務。西九龍總區昨晨展開代號「破繭」的行動打擊非法出租汽車,派出探員喬裝顧客透過手機程式租用5輛私家車,抵達目的地後以信用卡繳付車資,並隨即表露身份拘捕5名涉嫌非法載客取酬的司機。同時,警方下午亦搜查手機召車程式Uber的辦公室,拘捕3名職員及取走一批電腦和文件調查。


警方昨日採取打擊行動後,Uber手機應用程式繼續提供召車服務,未見受行動影響。被捕5名男司機相信是涉案車輛的車主,年齡介乎28至65歲,涉嫌「非法駕駛汽車作出租或取酬載客用途」及「駕駛汽車時無第三者保險」,獲准保釋,下月中旬向警方報到。涉案5輛私家車,包括豐田、寶馬及平治等品牌,事後亦被拖走。

至於被捕3名職員,年齡介乎21至29歲,涉嫌「協助及教唆非法駕駛汽車作出租或取酬載客用途」及「協助及教唆駕駛汽車時無第三者保險」。

西九龍交通部執行及管制組總督察孔憲裘表示,昨晨9時許派出探員喬裝乘客,透過手機應用程式租用兩輛私家車及3輛七人車,分別由沙田、秀茂坪及觀塘等地前往何文田,車資由70至170元不等。警員抵埗後即表露身份,並在信用卡成功過數後,拘捕5名司機。孔續稱,非法載客取酬不但犯法,汽車第三者保險亦會喪失,「試想有交通意外,車上乘客同其他道路使用者,亦都同一時間喪失所謂汽車第三者保險嘅保障,完全得唔到保障,後果可以好嚴重。」

十多名重案組探員,昨午亦到Uber位於長沙灣及中環的辦公室,一度封鎖長沙灣辦公室調查,禁止其他人進入,並帶走3名職員以及多部電腦主機。Uber每宗交易均會與司機拆帳,前者抽佣比例達兩成。

UBER is a service that brings power to the consumer and drivers, and should be governed, managed and consolidated with the current taxis, not simply put to jail. Both consumers and existing taxi drivers now have choice of service and employment, and the level of services will only improve as there is competition. Better drivers, better managed and choice of taxis, better passenger behaviour, better money for the drivers, better for environment! I don't see what's wrong without some thoughtful and delicate management.

The only people this hurts are investors, who should be responsible on their own risks and rewards. This is the creative, effective and 積極 way to deal with what everyone calls "霸權". Not just pointless protesting on the streets.

This is another case of the government putting a simple solution to a complex problem. Not enough milk formula? Put them to jail... Not enough housing? Tax 20%... 

Some possible work arounds for this is to sell bulk licenses to UBER, limiting to certain number of cars per period of time. Taxi license owners can choose to create a fleet of rental cars for existing taxi drivers, this can also be a source of investment for license holders. 

The internet is here and is the future and there's no stopping it, suck it up...
8. 湯文亮 2015-08-12 11:27:54
Alan,
歡迎,我提議閣下何不開一個專欄,中英文兼備,網友可分享你的心得兼學好英文,我會向網主提議,多謝支持
9. Alan Pepper 2015-08-13 01:48:52
湯博士,小弟已經很高興參與專欄,希望交流一下投資心得(基本上係學嘢)。亦希望盡我少少綿力,講多兩句勵志的說話,希望感染得到一些年青人,為我們下一代持續發展做啲嘢。香港長遠真係需要動力,真的不應該投放太多資源落政治上面。香港是一個沒有任何天然資源的地方,最終都係要靠人力、創意同努力才能有成果。Sustainability 才是最緊要。

只怕才疏學淺,但有時間一定會盡力而為。

Back to UBER. To expand on the possible solution. The government should consider issuing new "flexible" licenses to UBER. At current market price of around 7 mil each. And current taxi license holders can also sell and rent licenses to UBER too. This way license holders does not have to even own a taxi and manage it. Making UBER a taxi managing company. Each license, instead of assigned to 1 taxi, can now be handed over to the "temporary license holder" on a first come first serve basis (only the UBER driver who processes this license can take passengers. As passenger leaves the car he license is free for the next driver) This means if UBER has 1000 licenses then it can only have 1000 cars taking passengers at any one time. But drivers are now free to choose when they do business, not restricted to fixed schedules. This also solves the problem we have when taxis currently take shifts at around 4-5pm and lunch at the same time. Which is ridiculous considering its the rush hours. 

This technology along with 快的 creates efficiencies or eliminate down time, and government and laws must act faster to get with the times. Especially when the china government is pro tech right now. Hong Kong has the opportunity for testing ground for tech and we are losing to singapore and Korea because the government is extremely slow to react! And often times is a deterrent to new technologies because there are conflict of interests with existing parties. 
10. 引刀一快 2015-08-13 08:51:12
Alan Pepper兄

Uber係鬼佬嘢,仲有大量大陸嘅類似公司,比如神州、壹號專車、滴滴、以及并車app,唔知幾時會登陸香港呢。
11. Alan Pepper 2015-08-13 11:57:25
此乃大勢所趨,只欠東風。 綱上 Platform 「平台」將會(已經)成為新世代的物業。上主創造了大地,人類創造了 platform。
12. Alan Pepper 2015-08-13 12:00:03
越嚟越似 Matrix 了。最極端可能連地也不是必需品,只要有地方安置你的腦袋就可以了。好恐怖 😅😅

當然這是 sci fi.